Joydeep Choudhuri, previously a partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, has joined Latham & Watkins LLP as a partner in their London office. This move is part of Latham & Watkins’ strategic efforts to bolster their banking and finance practice in London. Professional Background Joydeep Choudhuri is renowned for his expertise in capital markets and […]
Joydeep Choudhuri Joins Latham & Watkins as Partner Read More »
The Jharkhand High Court has identified a significant error in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita published by Universal LexisNexis and has initiated a suo motu case to address the issue. This proactive step underscores the court’s commitment to ensuring the accuracy of legal texts, which are crucial for judicial and legal processes. Details of the Case
In a landmark ruling, the Madras High Court has emphasized that no individual should be denied access to quality medical treatment due to their economic situation. The court underscored the state’s responsibility to ensure that the health needs of all citizens are adequately met, regardless of their financial capabilities. Key Points of the Judgment Background
In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that filing a complaint before a lawful authority cannot be considered as abetment to suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This decision reinforces the principle that legal actions taken within the framework of the law do not constitute criminal abetment. Background
In a recent judgment, the Kerala High Court ruled that individuals extracting minerals from their own property do not require permission from authorities, provided the minerals are not transported outside the property. The court emphasized that the only obligations in such cases are to inform the relevant authorities and pay the requisite royalty. Background of
The Bombay High Court has quashed an order issued under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (MVAT) Act, citing discrepancies between the dates of creation and signing of the assessment order. The court ruled that the order was passed beyond the statutory period of four years, rendering it invalid. Background of the Case The case involved
Bombay High Court Quashes MVAT Order Passed Beyond 4 Years Due to Discrepancies in Dates Read More »
The Karnataka High Court has issued an order restraining the broadcasting of the news channel Power TV, citing the absence of proof regarding the renewal of its broadcasting license. This decision highlights the stringent regulatory requirements for media operations and the importance of compliance with licensing norms. Background Power TV, a prominent news channel in
The Supreme Court has issued a directive to the Delhi Government and the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to undertake the replantation of trees in response to the increasing heat waves attributed to the loss of green cover in the city. The court emphasized the critical role of urban greenery in mitigating climate extremes and improving
The Supreme Court has issued a directive to the Tamil Nadu government, instructing it not to obstruct buses that are registered in other states but possess an All India Tourist Permit. This decision aims to facilitate smoother interstate travel and uphold the rights granted under the permit system. Background The All India Tourist Permit allows
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) with a cost of Rs 25,000, underscoring the necessity for harsh measures to deal with the suppression of facts in legal proceedings. This decision reflects the court’s commitment to maintaining transparency and honesty in the judicial process. Background of the Case The SLP