Author name: Arshiya Banu

The Kerala High Court has dismissed a defamation case filed against the media channels Asianet and Kairali TV for their coverage of a Congress Member of Parliament (MP). The court’s decision supports journalistic freedom, affirming media rights to report on matters of public interest involving public figures. Background: The defamation case stemmed from news reports […]

The Supreme Court of India has upheld a Punjab and Haryana High Court order directing the Punjab State Election Commission to announce the schedule for the upcoming municipal elections. This decision emphasizes the judiciary’s commitment to timely democratic processes and local governance. Background: The Punjab municipal elections faced repeated delays, prompting a legal challenge over

The Supreme Court of India has stayed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into allegations against police officers in the Anna Nagar POCSO case. This pause in the investigation highlights judicial caution in cases involving sensitive allegations against law enforcement. Background: The case centers around allegations of police mishandling and misconduct in a POCSO

Leading law firms Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM), Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (SAM), AZB & Partners, J Sagar Associates (JSA), and Latham & Watkins have acted as advisors for Swiggy’s highly anticipated Initial Public Offering (IPO), valued at ₹11,327.4 crore. This collaboration involves some of the most prominent players in legal advisory for capital markets, underscoring the

The Supreme Court of India has stayed proceedings in an election petition filed by former cricketer and politician Mohammad Azharuddin against a Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLA. This pause effectively halts the lower court’s examination of the case, providing temporary relief to the MLA while the matter is reviewed by the apex court. Background: The

The Delhi High Court recently allowed Wikipedia to serve summons on users in a defamation lawsuit filed by the news agency Asian News International (ANI). This move highlights the evolving legal approach toward addressing defamatory content on collaborative online platforms. Background: ANI filed a defamation suit claiming that certain Wikipedia users had made false and

The Bombay High Court recently ruled that disclosing marks obtained by candidates in public recruitment processes does not constitute a violation of privacy. This decision reinforces the principle of transparency in government recruitment, balancing public interest with individual privacy rights. Background: The case arose when certain applicants contested the disclosure of their marks in a

The Supreme Court of India has agreed to hear a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that calls for mandatory age verification at liquor shops nationwide. The petition argues that stricter age-check protocols are essential to curb underage drinking and ensure compliance with legal drinking age limits. Background: The PIL was filed in response to growing concerns

The Kerala High Court recently held that merely driving at high speed does not automatically imply that the driver was acting rashly or negligently. This ruling emphasizes the need to consider additional factors before attributing blame for reckless driving in traffic incidents. Background: The case involved a driver who was accused of reckless and negligent

Justice RC Chavan has criticized Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud for focusing on his legacy, calling it “unbecoming” of the position he holds. This remark has sparked discussion on the role and responsibilities of the highest judicial office in India, particularly regarding personal concerns about legacy. Background: The comment comes amid a series