Author name: Arshiya Banu

The Supreme Court has recently disapproved of an Orissa High Court order that limited the bail period of an undertrial prisoner to just two months. The case involved Ranjit Digal, who had been in custody since May 2022. The Orissa High Court had granted him interim bail for three months, but this decision was challenged […]

The Allahabad High Court has reinforced that trial courts should base their decisions on framing charges solely on the evidence presented by the prosecution. This ruling emphasizes that at the stage of framing charges, the courts are not to conduct a detailed evaluation of the evidence as it would during a trial. Instead, the court’s

Amid growing concerns over the structural integrity of bridges in Bihar, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court, seeking a comprehensive structural audit of all recently constructed and under-construction bridges in the state. This action follows several incidents of bridge collapses, including the notable collapse of the Aguwani-Sultanganj bridge in

Justice Amit Sharma of the Delhi High Court has recused himself from hearing bail applications related to the Delhi riots cases. Specifically, he stepped aside from the bail hearing of Shahrukh Pathan, a prominent figure in the riots, and Asif Iqbal Tanha, who has contested the alleged media leak of his disclosure statement. Reasons for

In a notable decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the delicate balance between upholding the dignity of the judiciary and welcoming constructive criticism. The case in question involved contempt charges against an individual for making disparaging remarks about the judiciary. The High Court emphasized that judges are not beyond reproach and are open

In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court emphasized the need for an appellate mechanism to challenge the confiscation of vehicles used in the illegal transport of cattle. This decision aims to ensure that vehicle owners have a fair opportunity to contest confiscation orders and to address any potential misuse of power by authorities. Key

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has recently issued a ruling that diverges from the Kerala High Court’s stance on the effective date for initiating insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors. The disagreement primarily revolves around the procedural interpretation of when such proceedings should commence. Key Points of Divergence: Implications of the NCLAT Ruling: The

The Delhi High Court recently ruled that the reasons provided by the judicial collegium for rejecting candidates for judgeship positions are not to be disclosed publicly. This decision emphasizes the confidentiality of the selection process and protects the sensitive deliberations and evaluations conducted by the collegium. The court highlighted that such disclosures could undermine the

The Allahabad High Court recently intervened in a case where an elderly couple was confined by their son and daughter-in-law. The couple was subjected to confinement and mistreatment, prompting them to seek judicial intervention. Court’s Decision: Implications: This decision by the Allahabad High Court underscores the judiciary’s role in protecting vulnerable populations, especially senior citizens.

In response to the tragic stampede at the Hathras event, the Uttar Pradesh government has ordered a comprehensive investigation through a three-member judicial commission. This commission, formed under the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, aims to uncover the causes and accountability behind the incident which resulted in numerous casualties. Key Details of the Commission: Background