Author name: Arshiya Banu

In a significant ruling, the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) has set aside an arbitral award issued by a tribunal headed by a retired Indian judge, citing concerns over the quality and integrity of the decision-making process. The tribunal’s award was criticized for being a “copy-paste” document, raising questions about the fairness and thoroughness of […]

In a groundbreaking move aimed at improving the welfare of road accident victims across the country, the Supreme Court of India is set to consider a proposal that could revolutionize the way compensation and medical treatment are handled in such cases. The proposal suggests the implementation of cashless treatment and the online transfer of compensation

In a significant development in trademark law, the Bombay High Court has granted interim relief to the global fast-food giant, Burger King, in its ongoing legal battle against a Pune-based fast food joint. The court’s decision temporarily restrains the Pune establishment from using a name or branding that closely resembles Burger King’s registered trademarks, marking

In a landmark ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Chandigarh has emphasized that mere presumptions cannot form the basis for accusations of adultery against working women in divorce cases. The court ruled that concrete and cogent evidence is essential to substantiate such claims, thereby safeguarding the dignity and rights of working women facing

In a significant decision, the Allahabad High Court has granted relief to a group of journalists who were booked for their investigative report on diesel theft from police jeeps. This ruling underscores the importance of press freedom and the protection of journalists who perform their duty of bringing critical issues to light. Background of the

In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed its original side rule that mandates the submission of written statements within 120 days of the commencement of a legal suit. This decision underscores the court’s commitment to ensuring procedural efficiency and timely resolution of disputes in the legal system. Context of the Ruling: Key

In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has upheld its original side rule that mandates the filing of written statements within 120 days of the commencement of a legal suit. This decision is significant as it reinforces the court’s commitment to procedural efficiency and timely case management within the judicial system. Understanding the Rule:

In a recent address, Manan Mishra, Chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI), has issued a stark warning about the geopolitical threats India faces from its neighboring countries. Drawing parallels with the Bangladesh crisis, Mishra emphasized the need for India to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding its national interests. His comments underscore the

In a significant legal move, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed before the Bombay High Court, calling for a ban on popular online gambling apps Junglee Rummy and Rummy Circle. The PIL raises serious concerns about the widespread use of these apps, particularly highlighting their potential to promote gambling addiction and the negative

In a notable commentary, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul has expressed concerns over the government’s growing tendency to steer clear of arbitration in high-stakes legal matters. Labeling this approach as undesirable, Justice Kaul highlighted the potential pitfalls of bypassing arbitration in favor of traditional litigation, particularly in cases involving significant financial or public interest. Context of