Author name: Arshiya Banu

In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has emphasized the need to address the behavior of boys rather than placing the burden of conduct solely on girls. This directive comes in the context of the Badlapur case, shedding light on broader issues of gender equality and responsibility. Background of the Badlapur Case: Key Points […]

In a recent development, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Centre and State governments to respond to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the implementation of Braille labels on medicines. This move highlights a critical step toward ensuring accessibility and inclusivity for visually impaired individuals in India. Background of the PIL: Supreme Court’s

In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has urged a reconsideration of the compulsory attendance requirement in colleges. The court’s decision highlights the need for a nuanced approach to attendance policies, taking into account diverse student needs and academic engagement. Context of the Ruling: Key Points from the Court’s Ruling: Implications of the Ruling:

In a significant development within the media and entertainment sector, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL) and Sony Pictures Networks India have successfully reached a settlement regarding their merger. The agreement marks a major milestone in their merger process, as both companies have agreed to withdraw their claims from the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court has directed PVR INOX to take their ₹17 crore service tax dispute to the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). This decision underscores the Court’s approach to handling complex tax disputes and emphasizes the importance of appropriate legal channels for resolving such matters. Context of the

In a recent judicial development, the Delhi High Court has instructed the Chief Secretary to address allegations raised by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) concerning the selective installation of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government. This order comes amid concerns about transparency and fairness in the implementation of the CCTV

The Supreme Court of India is set to review a critical legal question: whether alimony can be granted in cases where a marriage is declared void. This issue has significant implications for family law, particularly in how courts address financial support obligations in cases where the marriage itself is deemed invalid. Context of the Review:

In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has stayed the Centre’s decision to omit a crucial rule aimed at curbing misleading advertisements related to AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) products. This ruling has substantial implications for the regulation of health-related advertisements and the protection of consumer rights. Background of the

In a noteworthy development, a Bombay High Court judge has recused themselves from the high-profile Sachin Waze case after having reserved orders on the matter. This unexpected turn of events adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing legal proceedings and highlights the intricate nature of judicial decisions in high-stakes cases. Background of the Sachin

In a significant development, the Supreme Court has granted bail to K Kavitha, a prominent political figure, in connection with the Delhi excise policy case. This decision marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal proceedings and highlights the evolving dynamics of high-profile legal battles in India. Background of the Case: Supreme Court’s Bail Decision: